We Don’t Need an Article V Convention to “Clarify” Our Constitution!

We Don’t Need an Article V Convention to “Clarify” Our Constitution!

- in Publius Huldah
@Publius Huldah
Beginning with Thomas Jefferson and continuing till after the Civil War, church services, attended by sitting Presidents, where held each Sunday in the U.S. Capitol Building
Beginning with Thomas Jefferson and continuing till after the Civil War, church services, attended by sitting Presidents, where held each Sunday in the U.S. Capitol Building


By Publius Huldah

Those pushing for the so-called “convention of states” 1 say we must amend the Constitution because the people in Washington “don’t understand it”.


Our Constitution is so simple that Alexander Hamilton expected us to be “enlightened enough to distinguish between a legal exercise and an illegal usurpation of authority”; and he said the people are “the natural guardians of the Constitution” (Federalist No. 16, next to last para).

Well then, if our Constitution is something The People are expected to know and enforce; is it plausible to assert that the Representatives we send to Washington – and even supreme Court Justices – are incapable of understanding it?

Justices on the supreme Court have been perverting our Constitution for a long time.  Do they do this because they are so stupid they don’t understand our Constitution?  Of course not!  They violate our Constitution because they claim the right to impose their own personal views on the rest of us.

As every American over the age of 10 should know, the powers our federal Constitution delegates to Congress and the President are limited & defined – they are “enumerated”.

So!  Progressives on the supreme Court had to find a way to get around the limitations imposed by the enumerated powers.  And they did it by perverting three clauses: the “interstate commerce”, “general welfare”, and “necessary and proper” clauses.

However, a quick look in The Federalist Papers shows the original intents of these clauses.  We don’t need a convention to draft amendments showing what these clauses mean – just look it up in The Federalist!  But!  You don’t have to – I’ve already done it – and here it is: 2

The “interstate commerce” clause (Art. I, §8, cl. 3)

Webster’s 1828 Dictionary says “commerce” is the buying and selling of goods.

In Federalist No. 22 (4th para) and Federalist No. 42 (9th & 10th paras), Hamilton and Madison explain the primary purpose of the clause: To prohibit the States from imposing taxes & tolls on merchandize as it is transported through the States for purposes of buying and selling.

The “general welfare” clause (Preamble & Art. I, §8, cl. 1)

Webster’s 1828 Dictionary defines “welfare” as:

“2. Exemption from any unusual evil or calamity; the enjoyment of peace and prosperity, or the ordinary blessings of society and civil government; applied to states.”

It has nothing to do with handouts, public relief, or the feds doing whatever they think is a good idea.

In Federalist No. 41 (last 4 paras), Madison points out that Art. I, § 8, employs “general terms” which are “immediately” followed by the “enumeration of particular powers” which “explain and qualify”, by a “recital of particulars”, the “general phrase”.  It is “error” to focus on “general expressions” and disregard “the specifications which ascertain and limit their import”; thus, to argue that the general expression provides an unlimited power is “an absurdity”.

So yes! The powers of Congress over the Country at Large really are limited primarily to those few listed at Art. I, §8, clauses 3-16.

Our Framers understood that “general Welfare”, i.e., the enjoyment of peace and prosperity, and the enjoyment of the ordinary blessings of society and civil government, was possible only with a federal government of strictly limited powers.  [Let that sink in.]

The “necessary and proper” clause (Art. I, §8, last clause)

This clause delegates to Congress power to pass all laws necessary and proper to execute its declared powers (Federalist No. 29, 4th para); “the constitutional operation of the intended government would be precisely the same if [this clause] were entirely obliterated as if [it] were repeated in every article”; a power to do something must be a power to pass all laws necessary and proper for the execution of that power, and thus the clause is “perfectly harmless”, a  tautology or redundancy” (Federalist No. 33, 2nd & 3rd paras).  Madison writes to the same effect in (Federalist No. 44, under his discussion of the SIXTH class of powers).

So the clause permits the execution of powers already delegated and enumerated in the Constitution.  No additional substantive powers are granted by the clause.

Learn the enumerated powers delegated to Congress & to the President.  With our Votes & Nullification of unconstitutional acts, let’s enforce the Constitution we already have.  Don’t let others change or replace it! PH


1 The term, “convention of states”, is deliberately deceptive.  The only convention for proposing amendments is the one at Article V of our Constitution – and Congress has the power to “call” it.  And since Article I, Sec. 8, last clause, vests in Congress all powers “necessary and proper” to carry out its power to “call” the convention, Congress decides all organizational issues, such as, the number and selection process for delegates.

But once the delegates (whoever they turn out to be) are seated, neither Congress nor the States have any control over them.  The delegates can do whatever they want. They can propose a new Constitution with a new method of ratification.  Here are two Constitutions already waiting in the wings:  The “Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America”, which you can read about from their own website HERE and from JBS HERE; or the “Constitution for the Newstates of America”, which you can read HERE.  Do you think that any of the delegates (remember, you have no idea who they will be), can be bribed to introduce and vote for one of these proposed constitutions?

Disabuse yourself of the false notion that “the States have to ratify anything the convention does”.  That is the second biggest lie ever told:  The proposed “Constitution for the Newstates of America” is ratified by a Referendum called by the President.  The States, as political bodies, never get the opportunity to reject it – they are dissolved and replaced by regions answerable directly to the new national government.

The ONLY precedent we have for an “amendments convention” is the federal convention of 1787 which drafted & proposed our existing Constitution.

HERE is the Resolution, made by the Continental Congress on February 21, 1787 (p 71-74), to call a convention to be held at Philadelphia:

“…for the sole and express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation”.

The delegates ignored their instructions and wrote an entirely new Constitution – the one we now have.  Furthermore, whereas Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation (LINK) required all of the then 13 States to ratify Amendments to the Articles; Article VII of the new Constitution required only 9 of the 13 States to ratify the new Constitution.

Do you see?

2 Our People don’t have a clue about what these 3 clauses mean.  So YOU learn the original intent.  On social media, start teaching that original intent to The People. Help turn on the lights in their minds. PH   



Thank you for stopping by Grumpy Opinions and while you are here, please SUBSCRIBE to our Grumpy Opinions newsletter to receive our emails. You can also subscribe to Grumpy Opinions’ in our right sidebar or if you have a WordPress.com account, in our WordPress.com READER in the admin panel on the top left. Social media accounts: Please follow and share with fellow patriots and friends.  ©2016-2018 Grumpy Opinions. All Rights Reserved.


  1. I wish the “COS” movement were losing momentum – but they are pushing forward – they have lots of money – lots of trolls roaming the internet to smear those who speak against a convention – we have a populace who can’t think or distinguish between truth and lies – they got some States to sign up this year – I expect they’ll get more next year – ….

    And meanwhile, they have got all the politicians and Tea Party groups who support a convention (and most of them do) to REFUSE to hear the opposing view. It is really frightening – “patriot” Americans refusing to permit the Real TRUTH-TELLING patriots to speak. We are witnessing right now a mass national suicide. Americans have no idea what is in store for them. And I can’t say they don’t deserve everything they will get. And yes, unless we have the money to go somewhere safe (like Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Michael Farris, etc.), we will suffer the same fate as the Stupid who brought this mess on us.
    I have found that supporters of a convention generally REFUSE to read my papers. They just repeat the personal attacks the COS gang came up with.

    1. People tend to refuse to look at anything that contradicts their preconceived notions.. It’s human nature and it’s not easy to overcome even with logical and rational arguments.. In sales you always want to be the first and last person someone sees before they make a decision.. First gives you the chance to shoot down the competition’s case before they have a chance to present it, last lets you correct any mis-information they might have picked up-

      That doesn’t mean the guy who’s first in and last out is being completely truthful it just means he’s in a better position to control the direction of the conversation..It’s like positioning yourself at the head of the table during a discussion..

      The reason I thought interest was waning is because I’m seeing far fewer tweets about it than I was earlier this year.. and when I do see a pro Article V tweet it’s frequently answered with a tweet linking a site that’s quoted or published one of your papers..

      That said, Twitter’s a big place.. What you see, or don’t see is determined by who you follow..I don’t follow Levin, Limbraugh or Farris.. I remember Farris bragging it would be a done deal by last 4th of July.. If I need to follow them let me know..

      About the Trolls, let Puma, Lady Impact or myself know anytime you need a hand with them.. we’ve all had a fair amount of practice.

  2. The “Revolutionary Communist Party, USA” is pushing one of the Constitutions the tweet refers to. We can expect mass killings with that one. I link to the Communist Party’s website in my paper.

    1. Morning PH

      The Article V Convention seems to have lost a lot of it’s earlier momentum.. Most of what’s wrong can be corrected by putting some teeth into the provisions of the Constitution and the laws designed to protect us from Government..

      The political class knows they can ignore their Oath Of Office. Instead of doing their job and telling the President NO, or defunding his illegal activities, they’re suing..

      Members of both parties are saying an Executive Order Granting Amnesty to 6,000,000 illegals in direct violation of existing law would “Probably” be unconstitutional.. What the hell?

  3. Interesting comment on twitter about PH’s Post

Comments are closed.

You may also like

URGENT BLAST ALERT  against South Carolina H 3166 (Term Limits) & more — Hearing Tuesday!

The following applications for an Article V convention